# 玩大发技巧万博里面在哪里买球

## 注册免费赠送彩金pt电子游戏明陞m88登录不了

In this exercise we will develop a neural network with fully-connected layers to perform classification, and test it out on the CIFAR-10 dataset.

Propagation:
FC1_out=X?W1+b1???(1) FC1\_out = X \cdot W_1+b_1 ---(1)
H_out=maximum(0,FC1_out)???(2) H\_out = maximum(0, FC1\_out)---(2)
FC2_out=H_out?W2+b2???(3) FC2\_out = H\_out \cdot W_2+b_2---(3)
final_output=softmax(FC2_out)???(4) final\_output = softmax(FC2\_out) ---(4)

Backpropogation
?L?FC2_out=final_output[N×C]?MaskMat[N×C]???（5) \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } = final\_output_{[N \times C]} - MaskMat_{[N \times C] } ---（5)
?L?W2=?FC2_out?W2?L?FC2_out=H_outT??L?FC2_out???(6) {\frac{\partial L}{\partial W_2 }} = \frac{\partial FC2\_out}{\partial W_2 } \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } =H\_out^T \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } ---(6)
?L?b2=?FC2_out?b2?L?FC2_out=[1...1][1×H]??L?FC2_out???(7) \frac{\partial L}{\partial b_2 } = \frac{\partial FC2\_out}{\partial b_2 } \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } = [1...1]_{ [1 \times H]} \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } ---(7)
?L?H_out=?L?FC2_out?FC2_out?H_out=?L?FC2_outWT2,?L?H_out=maxmium(?L?H_out,0)???(8) \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}= \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out } \frac{\partial FC2\_out}{\partial H\_out } = \frac{\partial L}{\partial FC2\_out }W_2^T , \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out} = maxmium( \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}, 0)--- (8)
?L?W1=?H_cout?W1??L?H_out=XT??L?H_out???(9) {\frac{\partial L}{\partial W_1 }} =\frac{\partial H\_cout}{\partial W_1} \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}=X^T \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}---(9)
?L?b1=?H_cout?b1??L?H_out=[1...1][1×N]??L?H_out???(10) {\frac{\partial L}{\partial b_1 }} =\frac{\partial H\_cout}{\partial b_1} \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}=[1...1]_{[1 \times N]} \cdot \frac{\partial L}{\partial H\_out}---(10)

# neural_net.py

import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt

class TwoLayerNet(object):
"""
A two-layer fully-connected neural network. The net has an input dimension of
N, a hidden layer dimension of H, and performs classification over C classes.
We train the network with a softmax loss function and L2 regularization on the
weight matrices. The network uses a ReLU nonlinearity after the first fully
connected layer.

In other words, the network has the following architecture:

input - fully connected layer - ReLU - fully connected layer - softmax

The outputs of the second fully-connected layer are the scores for each class.
"""

def __init__(self, input_size, hidden_size, output_size, std=1e-4):
"""
Initialize the model. Weights are initialized to small random values and
biases are initialized to zero. Weights and biases are stored in the
variable self.params, which is a dictionary with the following keys:

W1: First layer weights; has shape (D, H)
b1: First layer biases; has shape (H,)
W2: Second layer weights; has shape (H, C)
b2: Second layer biases; has shape (C,)

Inputs:
- input_size: The dimension D of the input data.
- hidden_size: The number of neurons H in the hidden layer.
- output_size: The number of classes C.
"""
self.params = {}
self.params['W1'] = std * np.random.randn(input_size, hidden_size)
self.params['b1'] = np.zeros(hidden_size)
self.params['W2'] = std * np.random.randn(hidden_size, output_size)
self.params['b2'] = np.zeros(output_size)

def loss(self, X, y=None, reg=0.0):
"""
Compute the loss and gradients for a two layer fully connected neural
network.

Inputs:
- X: Input data of shape (N, D). Each X[i] is a training sample.
- y: Vector of training labels. y[i] is the label for X[i], and each y[i] is
an integer in the range 0 <= y[i] < C. This parameter is optional; if it
is not passed then we only return scores, and if it is passed then we
- reg: Regularization strength.

Returns:
If y is None, return a matrix scores of shape (N, C) where scores[i, c] is
the score for class c on input X[i].

If y is not None, instead return a tuple of:
- loss: Loss (data loss and regularization loss) for this batch of training
samples.
with respect to the loss function; has the same keys as self.params.
"""
# Unpack variables from the params dictionary
W1, b1 = self.params['W1'], self.params['b1']
W2, b2 = self.params['W2'], self.params['b2']
N, D = X.shape

# Compute the forward pass
scores = None
#############################################################################
# TODO: Perform the forward pass, computing the class scores for the input. #
# Store the result in the scores variable, which should be an array of      #
# shape (N, C).                                                             #
#############################################################################

# evaluate class scores, [N x K]
hidden_layer = np.maximum(0, np.dot(X,W1)+b1) # ReLU activation
scores = np.dot(hidden_layer, W2)+b2

#############################################################################
#                              END OF YOUR CODE                             #
#############################################################################

# If the targets are not given then jump out, we're done
if y is None:
return scores

# Compute the loss
loss = None
#############################################################################
# TODO: Finish the forward pass, and compute the loss. This should include  #
# both the data loss and L2 regularization for W1 and W2. Store the result  #
# in the variable loss, which should be a scalar. Use the Softmax           #
# classifier loss. So that your results match ours, multiply the            #
# regularization loss by 0.5                                                #
#############################################################################

# compute the class probabilities
#scores -= np.max(scores, axis = 1)[:, np.newaxis]
#exp_scores = np.exp(scores)
exp_scores = np.exp(scores-np.max(scores, axis=1, keepdims=True))
probs = exp_scores/np.sum(exp_scores, axis=1, keepdims=True) #[N X C]

correct_logprobs = -np.log(probs[range(N),y])
data_loss = np.sum(correct_logprobs)/N
reg_loss = 0.5 * reg * ( np.sum(W1*W1) + np.sum(W2*W2) )
loss = data_loss + reg_loss

#############################################################################
#                              END OF YOUR CODE                             #
#############################################################################

#############################################################################
# TODO: Compute the backward pass, computing the derivatives of the weights #
# and biases. Store the results in the grads dictionary. For example,       #
# grads['W1'] should store the gradient on W1, and be a matrix of same size #
#############################################################################

# compute the gradient on scores
dscores = probs
dscores[range(N),y] -= 1
dscores /= N

# backpropate the gradient to the parameters
# first backprop into parameters W2 and b2
dW2 = np.dot(hidden_layer.T, dscores)
db2 = np.sum(dscores, axis=0, keepdims=False)
# next backprop into hidden layer
dhidden = np.dot(dscores, W2.T)
# backprop the ReLU non-linearity
dhidden[hidden_layer <= 0] = 0
# finally into W,b
dW1 = np.dot(X.T, dhidden)
db1 = np.sum(dhidden, axis=0, keepdims=False)

dW2 += reg * W2
dW1 += reg * W1

#print dW1.shape, dW2.shape, db1.shape, db2.shape
#############################################################################
#                              END OF YOUR CODE                             #
#############################################################################

def train(self, X, y, X_val, y_val,
learning_rate=1e-3, learning_rate_decay=0.95,
reg=1e-5, num_iters=100,
batch_size=200, verbose=False):
"""
Train this neural network using stochastic gradient descent.

Inputs:
- X: A numpy array of shape (N, D) giving training data.
- y: A numpy array f shape (N,) giving training labels; y[i] = c means that
X[i] has label c, where 0 <= c < C.
- X_val: A numpy array of shape (N_val, D) giving validation data.
- y_val: A numpy array of shape (N_val,) giving validation labels.
- learning_rate: Scalar giving learning rate for optimization.
- learning_rate_decay: Scalar giving factor used to decay the learning rate
after each epoch.
- reg: Scalar giving regularization strength.
- num_iters: Number of steps to take when optimizing.
- batch_size: Number of training examples to use per step.
- verbose: boolean; if true print progress during optimization.
"""
num_train = X.shape[0]
iterations_per_epoch = max(num_train / batch_size, 1)

# Use SGD to optimize the parameters in self.model
loss_history = []
train_acc_history = []
val_acc_history = []

for it in xrange(num_iters):
X_batch = None
y_batch = None

#########################################################################
# TODO: Create a random minibatch of training data and labels, storing  #
# them in X_batch and y_batch respectively.                             #
#########################################################################
sample_index = np.random.choice(num_train, batch_size, replace=True)
X_batch = X[sample_index, :]
y_batch = y[sample_index]

#########################################################################
#                             END OF YOUR CODE                          #
#########################################################################

# Compute loss and gradients using the current minibatch
loss, grads = self.loss(X_batch, y=y_batch, reg=reg)
loss_history.append(loss)

#########################################################################
# TODO: Use the gradients in the grads dictionary to update the         #
# parameters of the network (stored in the dictionary self.params)      #
# using stochastic gradient descent. You'll need to use the gradients   #
# stored in the grads dictionary defined above.                         #
#########################################################################
self.params['W1'] -= learning_rate*dW1
self.params['W2'] -= learning_rate*dW2
self.params['b1'] -= learning_rate*db1
self.params['b2'] -= learning_rate*db2

#########################################################################
#                             END OF YOUR CODE                          #
#########################################################################

if verbose and it % 100 == 0:
print 'iteration %d / %d: loss %f' % (it, num_iters, loss)

# Every epoch, check train and val accuracy and decay learning rate.
if it % iterations_per_epoch == 0:
# Check accuracy
train_acc = (self.predict(X_batch) == y_batch).mean()
val_acc = (self.predict(X_val) == y_val).mean()
train_acc_history.append(train_acc)
val_acc_history.append(val_acc)

# Decay learning rate
learning_rate *= learning_rate_decay

return {
'loss_history': loss_history,
'train_acc_history': train_acc_history,
'val_acc_history': val_acc_history,
}

def predict(self, X):
"""
Use the trained weights of this two-layer network to predict labels for
data points. For each data point we predict scores for each of the C
classes, and assign each data point to the class with the highest score.

Inputs:
- X: A numpy array of shape (N, D) giving N D-dimensional data points to
classify.

Returns:
- y_pred: A numpy array of shape (N,) giving predicted labels for each of
the elements of X. For all i, y_pred[i] = c means that X[i] is predicted
to have class c, where 0 <= c < C.
"""
y_pred = None

###########################################################################
# TODO: Implement this function; it should be VERY simple!                #
###########################################################################
hidden_lay = np.maximum(0, np.dot(X,self.params['W1'])+self.params['b1'])
y_pred = np.argmax( np.dot(hidden_lay, self.params['W2']), axis=1)

###########################################################################
#                              END OF YOUR CODE                           #
###########################################################################

return y_pred



What’s wrong?. Looking at the visualizations above, we see that the loss is decreasing more or less linearly, which seems to suggest that the learning rate may be too low. Moreover, there is no gap between the training and validation accuracy, suggesting that the model we used has low capacity, and that we should increase its size. On the other hand, with a very large model we would expect to see more overfitting, which would manifest itself as a very large gap between the training and validation accuracy.

Tuning. Tuning the hyperparameters and developing intuition for how they affect the final performance is a large part of using Neural Networks, so we want you to get a lot of practice. Below, you should experiment with different values of the various hyperparameters, including hidden layer size, learning rate, numer of training epochs, and regularization strength. You might also consider tuning the learning rate decay, but you should be able to get good performance using the default value.

Approximate results. You should be aim to achieve a classification accuracy of greater than 48% on the validation set. Our best network gets over 52% on the validation set.

Experiment: You goal in this exercise is to get as good of a result on CIFAR-10 as you can, with a fully-connected Neural Network. For every 1% above 52% on the Test set we will award you with one extra bonus point. Feel free implement your own techniques (e.g. PCA to reduce dimensionality, or adding dropout, or adding features to the solver, etc.).

# two_layer_net.ipynb

best_net = None # store the best model into this
best_stats = None
#################################################################################
# TODO: Tune hyperparameters using the validation set. Store your best trained  #
# model in best_net.                                                            #
#                                                                               #
# To help debug your network, it may help to use visualizations similar to the  #
# ones we used above; these visualizations will have significant qualitative    #
# differences from the ones we saw above for the poorly tuned network.          #
#                                                                               #
# Tweaking hyperparameters by hand can be fun, but you might find it useful to  #
# write code to sweep through possible combinations of hyperparameters          #
# automatically like we did on the previous exercises.                          #
#################################################################################
input_size = 32 * 32 * 3
hidden_size = 300
num_classes = 10

results = {}
best_val = -1
learning_rates = [1e-3, 1.2e-3, 1.4e-3, 1.6e-3, 1.8e-3]
regularization_strengths = [1e-4, 1e-3, 1e-2]

params = [(x,y) for x in learning_rates for y in regularization_strengths ]
for lrate, regular in params:
net = TwoLayerNet(input_size, hidden_size, num_classes)
# Train the network
stats = net.train(X_train, y_train, X_val, y_val,
num_iters=1600, batch_size=400,
learning_rate=lrate, learning_rate_decay=0.90,
reg=regular, verbose=False)

# Predict on the validation set
accuracy_train = (net.predict(X_train) == y_train).mean()
accuracy_val = (net.predict(X_val) == y_val).mean()
results[(lrate, regular)] = (accuracy_train, accuracy_val)
if( best_val < accuracy_val ):
best_val = accuracy_val
best_net = net
best_stats = stats

# Print out results.
for lr, reg in sorted(results):
train_accuracy, val_accuracy = results[(lr, reg)]
print 'lr %e reg %e train accuracy: %f val accuracy: %f' % (
lr, reg, train_accuracy, val_accuracy)

print 'best validation accuracy achieved during cross-validation: %f' % best_val

# Plot the loss function and train / validation accuracies
plt.subplot(2, 1, 1)
plt.plot(best_stats['loss_history'])
plt.title('Loss history')
plt.xlabel('Iteration')
plt.ylabel('Loss')

plt.subplot(2, 1, 2)
plt.plot(best_stats['train_acc_history'], label='train',color='r')
plt.plot(best_stats['val_acc_history'], label='val',color='g')
plt.title('Classification accuracy history')
plt.xlabel('Epoch')
plt.ylabel('Clasification accuracy')
plt.show()

#################################################################################
#                               END OF YOUR CODE                                #
#################################################################################

lr 1.000000e-03 reg 1.000000e-04 train accuracy: 0.541551 val accuracy: 0.499000
lr 1.000000e-03 reg 1.000000e-03 train accuracy: 0.541694 val accuracy: 0.511000
lr 1.000000e-03 reg 1.000000e-02 train accuracy: 0.540898 val accuracy: 0.490000
lr 1.200000e-03 reg 1.000000e-04 train accuracy: 0.562041 val accuracy: 0.528000
lr 1.200000e-03 reg 1.000000e-03 train accuracy: 0.563653 val accuracy: 0.507000
lr 1.200000e-03 reg 1.000000e-02 train accuracy: 0.564184 val accuracy: 0.512000
lr 1.400000e-03 reg 1.000000e-04 train accuracy: 0.580857 val accuracy: 0.532000
lr 1.400000e-03 reg 1.000000e-03 train accuracy: 0.580857 val accuracy: 0.513000
lr 1.400000e-03 reg 1.000000e-02 train accuracy: 0.575245 val accuracy: 0.534000
lr 1.600000e-03 reg 1.000000e-04 train accuracy: 0.593347 val accuracy: 0.529000
lr 1.600000e-03 reg 1.000000e-03 train accuracy: 0.594857 val accuracy: 0.548000
lr 1.600000e-03 reg 1.000000e-02 train accuracy: 0.593878 val accuracy: 0.551000
lr 1.800000e-03 reg 1.000000e-04 train accuracy: 0.605306 val accuracy: 0.537000
lr 1.800000e-03 reg 1.000000e-03 train accuracy: 0.610000 val accuracy: 0.533000
lr 1.800000e-03 reg 1.000000e-02 train accuracy: 0.603204 val accuracy: 0.546000
best validation accuracy achieved during cross-validation: 0.551000
Test accuracy: 0.542

$(function () {$('pre.prettyprint code').each(function () { var lines = $(this).text().split('\n').length; var$numbering = \$('